grafana配置告警:蒋高明：方舟子说除草剂农达原粉比食盐还低 让畸形婴儿说话！

作者：蒋高明    文章发于：中国经济时报    点击数： 496    更新时间：2012-1-14  顶    荐  【字体：小大】
【复制本文】【下载本文】
蒋高明
为继续维护转基因商业利益，著名打假更造假打真斗士方舟子有下面的雷人语：孟山都除草剂农达原粉毒性比食盐还低！
虹桥科教论坛 送交者: 明天会更好 于 2012-01-13 03:42:13
@旋风柴进 ： 公然撒谎证据： @方舟子 公开宣称：“孟山都除草剂“农达”......对人体健康没有任何危险。” ——如何解释农民喝农达自杀身亡？
@方舟子 :说一种农药低毒无害是指施用剂量而言的，而不是指当饮食往嘴里灌。农达原粉的毒性比食盐还低，还有人喝它自杀，真是怪异。
@司马南:方舟子的回答，诸位有何补充。
@平方根的小窝: 我们做一个实验：俺喝一定量的食盐水，方舟子喝同样量同样浓度的农达。
@金微：可以试验，有对照，有对比。
@金微：遇到这叉子真是没办法.说不清.不讨论了.让方舟子实验完再说吧。
如果方舟子作为娱乐人士，他的上述话不会有人当真，还以为是愚人节说的笑话。可事实是，方舟子经常在媒体上出现，以科学、正义、正确自居，他的话就具有非常大的欺骗性。
正如他多次宣称的“面粉增白剂无害、瘦肉精无害、中医有害、转基因更安全环保、经期做爱无害、男生手淫无害、坐月子是陋习”一样，他的“草甘膦危害比食盐毒性还小”，注定又是方氏一大发明——撒谎不打草稿的作品。
讲话是要有证据的，以科学自居的方某人，在没有科学实验证据的前提下，凭什么信口说草甘膦无害呢？
还是让我们来看看下面的图片，方氏谎言就不攻自破了。其中草甘膦致婴儿畸形的文章，许多网页打不开，可见转基因巨头是非常害怕这篇文章的，靠删文章继续维护其巨大商业利益。
中国进口的转基因大豆草甘膦含量没有一个说法，中国人吃的转基因大豆油草甘膦含量也至今没有一个说法。吃饭是天大的事，草甘膦的危害以及转基因食品的危害，必须让公众知晓，不能靠转基因巨头给你信誓旦旦地保证，更不能让方舟子的谎言继续在公众群体中发酵！
Regulators knew roundup causes birth defects: Lied to public （当局已知道农达导致出生缺陷：转基因巨头公司对公众撒谎）
http://www.naturalnews.com/032707_RoundUp_birth_defects.html
http://hashonomy.com/link/regulators-knew-roundup-causes-birth-defects-lied-to-public-food-freedom-122500/

图1 农达除草剂导致的畸形婴儿

图2 法国电视台对农达除草剂的揭露

图3 法国电视台讲解草甘膦除草剂危害机理

图4 美国农民戴面具打农达除草剂，有没有毒害，农民最有发言权
(NaturalNews) Regulators have known since 1980 that Roundup, the herbicide manufactured by U.S. company Monsanto, causes birth defects, and have done nothing to make the information public, according to a new report released June 7 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/...).
The report, "Roundup and birth defects: Is the public being kept in the dark?" by Earth Open Source, found that regulators knew the chemical on which Roundup is based, glyphosate, can cause birth defects in laboratory animals. Earth Open Source is an organization that aims to use open source collaboration to engage people in programs that help nourish humanity, increase equity, support food security, and preserve the Earth.
Regulators also misled the public about the safety of the chemical, according to the report. In one instance, the German Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, the German government body handling the glyphosate review, told the European Commission there was no evidence the chemical causes birth defects.
This is not the first instance of accusations against the world's best-selling herbicide. Earlier this year, researchers found that genetically modified crops used in conjunction with Roundup contain a pathogen that may cause animal miscarriages. Don Huber, professor emeritus at Purdue University, wrote an open letter to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack regarding the newly discovered pathogen, in which he requested a moratorium on deregulation of crops that are genetically modified to withstand heavy applications of Roundup, commonly called Roundup Ready crops.
"It is well-documented that glyphosate promotes soil pathogens and is already implicated with the increase of more than 40 plant diseases," Huber said in the letter, adding that the pathogen is implicated in spontaneous abortions in cattle at rates as high as 45 percent.
The situation could be catastrophic according to Huber's letter:
"A team of senior plant and animal scientists have recently brought to my attention the discovery of an electron microscopic pathogen that appears to significantly impact the health of plants, animals, and probably human beings. Based on a review of the data, it is widespread, very serious, and is in much higher concentrations in Roundup Ready (RR) soybeans and corn -- suggesting a link with the RR gene or more likely the presence of Roundup. This organism appears NEW to science!
This is highly sensitive information that could result in a collapse of U.S. soy and corn export markets and significant disruption of domestic food and feed supplies. On the other hand, this new organism may already be responsible for significant harm ...
Naturally, if either the RR gene or Roundup itself is a promoter or co-factor of this pathogen, then [approval of RR alfalfa] could be a calamity. Based on the current evidence, the only reasonable action at this time would be to delay deregulation ...
For the past 40 years, I have been a scientist in the professional and military agencies that evaluate and prepare for natural and man-made biological threats, including germ warfare and disease outbreaks. Based on this experience, I believe the threat we are facing from this pathogen is unique and of a high risk status. In layman's terms, it should be treated as an emergency."
Appropriate legislation unlikelyAlthough originally set to be reviewed in 2012, the European Commission decided to delay the glyphosate review until 2015. It will not be reviewed under more stringent, up-to-date standards until 2030.
"Our examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the current approval of glyphosate and Roundup is deeply flawed and unreliable," according to the Earth Open Source report.
"What is more, we have learned from experts familiar with pesticide assessments and approvals that the case of glyphosate is not unusual," the report continued. "They say that the approvals of numerous pesticides rest on data and risk assessments that are just as scientifically flawed, if not more so. This is all the more reason why the Commission must urgently review glyphosate and other pesticides according to the most rigorous and up-to-date standards."
Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/032707_RoundUp_birth_defects.html#ixzz1jPABm4dC