沙宣无硅油洗发水法国:To whom does Pacific Century belong?

来源:百度文库 编辑:中财网 时间:2024/04/30 00:10:42
By Ruan Zongze (People's Daily Overseas Edition)
16:08, December 20, 2011China concerned about Kazakhstan's riots Steel demand, supply growth to slow52 arrested for producing, selling "gutter oil"Expressway pile-up kills one, injures threeXuelong recovers Antarctic buoys deployedChina's logistics value up 12.5% in Jan.-Nov.Recommended reader’s comments (Dec. 19)
What's happening in China
¥1mln worth Sentinel Prime appears in Hebei
New solar projects to fuel Xinjiang's clean energy Chinese stocks close down Tuesday Fund for protecting private enterprises launched More than 40 wild pandas live near NW China city Cold front to hit central, east China Over half Chinese living in urban areas



China Features
Hong Kong braces for mainland luxury spreeBitter medicine for sick peopleUrban population to exceed rural populationCentury-old Fenjiu fetches $125,000 at auctionGuangzhou launches official microblogHundreds of fugitives surrender online in E ChinaOpinionsFew family businesses hire professional managersUS media hypes 'cyber Cold War' Farmers find city life unfair: reportSoccer bribe trials chance to clean up sport's legacy Euro zone makes progress in systemic reforms



Notice for "Me and People's Daily Online" solicitation of articlesFocus on channel, witness the intersectionInt'l solidarity critical to facing world's challenges U.S., Japan, India hold first trilateral dialogue Canada issues first "super visa" Kim Jong Un pays respects at bier of Kim Jong IlObama stresses support for Tunisia
Edited and Translated by People's Daily Online
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton published an article in the Foreign Policy magazine last month and then delivered a speech in the East-West Center claiming that the Pacific Century was the U.S. century.
She said the United States was standing at a pivot point. As the war in Iraq winds up, the Asian-Pacific region has gradually become the global strategic and economic center in the 21st century and will become the focus of U.S. diplomatic strategy.
The United States not only says like this but also does this way. President Obama has billed himself as 'Pacific President" since he took office and America the "permanent state" in the Asian-Pacific region.
The major reason for the scenario is that the Asian-Pacific region is the world's most dynamic economic region and the United States needs to share the dividends of economic growth in this region.
Most of the top 10 trading partners of the United States are in the Asian-Pacific region. It's hard to imagine how the United States can achieve its ambitious "multiplying exports" program when leaving the Asian-Pacific region.
【1】 【2】 【3】 

Email|Print|Comments(Editor:姚春)
Increases the bookmark
twitter
facebook
Sina Microblog
digg
Google
Delicious
buzz
friendfeed
Linkedin
diigo
reddit
stumbleupon
Qzone
QQ Microblog
Related Reading
Japan's ex-Farm Minister may seek to have pro-TPP Noda replacedUS rule of TPP halts natural expansionJapan likely to join TPP talks despite worries on farm sectorTPP member holds third round negotiation in BruneiVietnam, U.S. to actively participate in TPP negotiationsU.S. says it prefers TPP with Malaysia Most PopularUS 'should play constructive role in re…
Trade, exchange rate frictions expected
Chinese naval escort task force calls a…
Property prices in big cities declining
Weibo regulations a step on the right p…
Nearly 9 years on, US withdraws from Ir…
Growth moderation not "bad thing" for C…
Chinese Embassy in Philippines renders …
2 killed, 4 rescued in NW China coal mi…
Museum to be built on remains of Yuan D…


Opinions
Few family businesses hire professional managersUS media hypes 'cyber Cold War' Farmers find city life unfair: reportSoccer bribe trials chance to clean up sport's legacy Euro zone makes progress in systemic reforms Weibo regulations a step on the right pathReal names on Weibo points to progressChina's foreign policy not a matter of tough vs. softGrowth moderation not "bad thing" for ChinaRisks behind India's military buildup