达芬奇公式用数学表示的话是 D² = ∑d_i ²，其中D表示树干的直径，d_i表示次生分枝的直径，i = 1, 2, ... n。对于真实的树，方程式中的指数并不总是等于2，根据物种不同它的值介于1.8到2.3之间。植物学家猜测这与树从根部到树叶的泵水过程有关，认为将水从下运输到上部植物需要相同的静脉总直径。流体力学专家Christophe Eloy指出，植物自然生长采用的是分形方式，他发现持续的风压对树木生长有影响，在风力作用下树枝可能会断裂，他通过计算机模型计算出树枝要多粗才能抵抗风压而不会断裂，结果精确预测了达芬奇公式的指数应该在1.8到2.3之间。

Leonardo's Formula Explains Why Trees Don't Splinter

The graceful taper of a tree trunk into branches, boughs, and twigs is so familiar that few people notice what Leonardo da Vinci observed: A tree almost always grows so that the total thickness of the branches at a particular height is equal to the thickness of the trunk. Until now, no one has been able to explain why trees obey this rule. But a new study may have the answer.

Leonardo's rule holds true for almost all species of trees, and graphic artists routinely use it to create realistic computer-generated trees. The rule says that when a tree's trunk splits into two branches, the total cross section of those secondary branches will equal the cross section of the trunk. If those two branches in turn each split into two branches, the area of the cross sections of the four additional branches together will equal the area of the cross section of the trunk. And so on.

Expressed mathematically, Leonardo's rule says that if a branch with diameter (D) splits into an arbitrary number (n) of secondary branches of diameters (d₁, d_2, et cetera), the sum of the secondary branches' diameters squared equals the square of the original branch's diameter. Or, in formula terms: D² = ∑d_i², where i = 1, 2, ... n. For real trees, the exponent in the equation that describes Leonardo's hypothesis is not always equal to 2 but rather varies between 1.8 and 2.3 depending on the geometry of the specific species of tree. But the general equation is still pretty close and holds for almost all trees.

Botanists have hypothesized that Leonardo's observation has something to do with how a tree pumps water from its roots to leaves. The idea being that the tree needs the same total vein diameter from top to bottom to properly irrigate the leaves.

But this didn't sound right to Christophe Eloy, a visiting physicist at the University of California (UC), San Diego, who is also affiliated with University of Provence in France. Eloy, a specialist in fluid mechanics, agreed that the equation had something to do with a tree's leaves, not in how they took up water, and the force of the wind caught by the leaves as it blew.

Eloy used some insightful mathematics to find the wind-force connection. He modeled a tree as cantilevered beams assembled to form a fractal network. A cantilevered beam is anchored at only one end; a fractal is a shape that can be split into parts, each of which is a smaller, though sometimes not exact, copy of the larger structure. For Eloy's model, this meant that every time a larger branch split into smaller branches, it split into the same number of branches, at approximately the same angles and orientations. Most natural trees grow in a fairly fractal fashion.

Because the leaves on a tree branch all grow at the same end of the branch, Eloy modeled the force of wind blowing on a tree's leaves as a force pressing on the unanchored end of a cantilevered beam. When he plugged that wind-force equation into his model and assumed that the probability of a branch breaking due to wind stress is constant, he came up with Leonardo's rule. He then tested it with a numerical computer simulation that comes at the problem from a different direction, calculating forces on branches and then using those forces to figure out how thick the branches must be to resist breakage (see illustration). The numerical simulation accurately predicts the branch diameters and the 1.8-to-2.3 range of Leonardo's exponent, Eloy reveals in a paper soon to be published in Physical Review Letters.

"Trees are very diverse organisms, and Christophe seems to have arrived at a simple and elegant physical principle that explains how branches taper in size as you go from the trunk, through the boughs, up to the twigs," says Marcus Roper, a mathematician at UC Berkeley. "It's surprising and wonderful that no one thought of [the wind explanation] sooner."

"This study brings trees up to par with manmade structures that have been primarily designed taking into account wind-loading considerations, the Eiffel Tower being perhaps the most well-known example," says Pedro Reis, an engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. The results of this research could "impact our understanding of wind-based damage, such as the destruction by the recent Hurricane Irene," he says, which toppled trees across a large swath of the northeastern United States in September.