马尔杜克皮鞋怎么样:转:How to write a literature review? (文献综述四步走)

Step 1: Read a lot.

第一步：大量的读。

Sounds simplistic, but the fact is that you do have to read a lot, and read with care and purpose. There are things that you can do within the process to make your life easier, and the purpose of this short document is to point some of them out. Hopefully, this will help. However, there is no substitute for good, thorough, and hard work.

这个听起来简单，但事实上，你需要细心并带有目的的读大量的文献。有些事情按一定的步骤进行可以让生活更简单，这个短文的目的是指出其中的几点。希望会对大家有所帮助。然而，这不能代替好的，全面的努力工作。

When you start your reading, start broadly. If you have an area you are interested in, such as computers in education, multi-media, distance education, web-based instruction, or some other specific concentration, start your reading in those areas. Course assigned reading will help, but you will have to branch outwards and inwards. Don’t be afraid to follow an area that seems not to be related to your area. You are trying to define your interests. Allow yourself the freedom to do that. Here are some tips on how you might branch out, and/or focus in:

当你开始阅读的时候，要广泛的读。如果你由自己感兴趣的领域，如教育中的电脑使用，多媒体，远程教育，网络基础等其他具体领域，从你感兴趣的领域开始阅读。课程安排的指定阅读资料将会对你有帮助，但你得看很多分支领域的资料。对于与你研究领域不同的领域也要有所了解。你要试着自己去定义你的兴趣点。下面是关于你怎样找到可能的研究领域的一些小提示：

A. Look carefully at the references. Should the author raise a salient point that interests you and they happen to cite somebody, look up the citation and read the original source. The original source will have its own references, follow these. Repeat as necessary.

A.仔细看参考文献。作者提出了让你感兴趣的观点，恰好是引用的别人的话，查找引用观点的原文并阅读。原文也会有它自己的参考文献，在顺着查找。如果需要的话，继续重复。

B. Read from tangentially related fields. Don’t be afraid to look outside of the literature in IT to other areas. Educational Psychology, Human Resources, Computer Science, and Communications Studies are but a few of the related fields with important information related to our field.

B.在其他有联系的领域中阅读。

Step 2: Define the area.

第二步：定义你的研究领域。

The purpose of a literature is to review all of the relevant literature on a particular topic. ALL OF THE INFORMATION. A daunting task, no doubt. The reason we do this is to see what has been said about the subject in order to couch our own research within the context of the existing body of literature. We are trying to ADD to that body. It is important to know what that body of knowledge says so that we know where our own work should go, and, ultimately, does go. Keep in mind that when you are reviewing the literature, typically you are looking at the literature that deals with your particular area. So if you are looking at motivation in CBT, you would focus on that literature, and not every thing ever written about CBT.

With that said, you will be reading a lot. No doubt about it. However, there are a few things you could do to make your life easier, and your work more focused.

A. Define the sources you will look to for information.

A.定义你要寻找信息的资料。

With the explosion in our access to information, this becomes more and more important. At the beginning of your review of the literature, state what indices, libraries, and other sources you may have looked at. Indices might be, ERIC, Psyc Lit, DAI, or other bound or electronic repositories of printed information. Libraries other than our own can be searched. Internet access through Gopher or the WWW will allow you to search libraries from here to Brisbane Australia. Tell your reader where you looked.

B. Exclude things that are not relevant.

B.排除不相关的资料。

When I was doing a study on screen design, I intentionally did not look at literature before 1984. 1984 marked the beginning of the graphical user interface. I did not need information that was not related to the graphical user interface. The point is, I saved myself time and effort in not reading irrelevant, or dated information. There were references pre-1984, but they were not technical references.

C. Make no apologies.

C.不要“道歉”。

Don’t tell me your literature review is flawed from the beginning. Tell the reader where you looked, what you excluded, but don’t tell them that there are hundreds of libraries where you didn’t look. As a reader, I depend on you, the researcher to make good decisions.

不要说你的文献综述从开始就错了。告诉你的读者你从哪找到这些文献的，你排除了哪些文献，但是不要告诉读者有多少图书馆你还没有查找。作为读者，我依赖你的研究，研究者要做很好的决定。

Step 3: Keeping track of all of this stuff.

第三步：跟踪阅读相关材料。

The hard part is trying to make sense of a body of literature that you will read over a period of, literally, years. In that time, trends will change, and new things will happen. It is your job to keep track of all of this so when it comes time to write the literature review, you (1) know what you are talking about, and (2) don’t have to re-read everything. Here are some tips on how to manage all of this information.

A. Copy articles. Whenever you read something that seems important, copy it and put it in a file. Even if you think it may not be important, copy it any way. Importance may grow on you.

B. Write down all bibliographic information on the copy of the article. Or, copy the table of contents of the journal or book. Double check when you copy the information that you have all the bibliographic information. I can’t tell you how frustrated I was when trying to write a reference list when I had forgotten to get all of the information.

C. Note cards versus data bases. I know some people who take notes on 3”x5” index cards. Other people create databases of information of all they have read. You decide what works for you. The point is that you will need to keep track of all of this in a form you can use. EndNote Plus is a piece of commercially available software that is made specifically for handling and formatting bibliographic information for writers.

Step 4: Writing it up.

第四步：进行写作。

When writing a literature review, keep in mind that you are reviewing the literature, not summarizing it. For example, if Smith (1978) conducted a study which found that squirrels preferred pecans to acorns, you want to say something like the following:

当开始写文献综述的时候，始终要记住你实在对文献进行评述，而不是总结。

Smith (1978) found that squirrels preferred pecans to acorns.

You do not want to do this:

Smith (1978) conducted a 3x3x3 factorial design to study squirrels. He concentrated on brown squirrels, stating “flying squirrels are just too damn unpredictable to study” (page 54). 1000 squirrels were broken into six groups and given the choice of nuts to eat. 1 group was given nothing but pecans, the other nothing but acorns, and then allowed to switch, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH......

The point is that in reviewing literature, you do not have to summarize it. If I want to read it, I will. There are exceptions. If you are proving a particular study, or disproving a particular study, then you would want to give more information on the study than the outcomes and the author with citation. But what you are trying to do is prove a point, and you are trying to write well and cogently within the confines of APA format. Use the literature as examples to make your point.

Additionally, if you are citing a bunch of people who say the same thing, summarize the basics of their point and cite them in string. For example:

While Smith (1978) says that squirrels prefer pecans to acorns, his theory was questioned and disproved by a number of people who found that there was no significant difference for nut preference among squirrels (Amos, 1979; Barry, 1980; Catzenjammer, 1980, Douglas, 1980; Zimmerman, 1983).

For some areas of study, there are a large number of people doing studies on the topic. For example, the literature is full of studies of learner control. Some studies say that more learner control is better, some say that less learner control is better. You can report that through a narrative, but a chart indicating the authors of the studies, the findings of the studies, and where the authors fall in all of this could be helpful as well:

Authors Type of study Findings Problems with the study
Jones, 1999 2-tailed t-Test NSD Killed the control group.
Ullmer, 2001 Case Study Users are more likely to like more learner control if they are bribed. Author convicted of subject bribing.
Williams, 1998 3x3x3 Factorial design Preference for less learner control. Small sample size (n=2)

Literature reviews don’t have to necessarily be long, they just have to be complete. Anything that you can do to help your reader process this information, and possibly cut down on your own narratives will be appreciated by your reader.

Closing Thoughts

Unfortunately, I don’t have any real references for you to read in how to write a literature review. The most common mistakes people make are that they don’t do enough literature, or they do too much literature, or they summarize the literature rather than review it. Remember that you are trying to set the stage for your own work, and that outside of the dissertation, you will never have more than about 2 pages in which to do it. I would recommend that you read some literature reviews to find out how others have done this. See what you like, and what you do not like. The Review of Educational Research (RER) publishes nothing but literature reviews. Additionally, check our library for dissertations done at NIU that have literature reviews. Also, I would give this handout the very important caveat that my opinions on what is a good literature review may be different than somebody else’s. These types of activities are nearly always situational: What works well as a lit review for one study may not work for another. Listen to what I have said, and always be open to other ideas. And as always, if you can help me make this better, give me your comments.